![]() ![]() Moving from one platform to another really created a feeling of ‘audience’, as we could see people in one platform that we had seen previously in another. Thirty viewers stayed on Twitch, while seventy viewers switched along with us through the five different platforms. How did it go?Ī consistent stream of 100 viewers watched the talks of The Hmm in Quarantine. You’ll see the results of this survey and some of our visitor’s comments quoted throughout this article.Īn emoji representing my The Hmm in Quarantine experience? A life is worth living again face. Following the experiment we asked our audience to fill out a survey about their experience. ![]() Twitch became the place where our audience could go to if they were running into trouble with the other platforms or wanted to chat with us. On Twitch, all presentations (except for the one over YouTube) were streamed. Because some platforms allow only a limited amount of visitors, and because not all our technical tests went so smooth, we decided to use Twitch as our backup platform. Every platform had its own technical opportunities and limitations-listed at the bottom of this article-which made organising this event quite time consuming for our team. From one embraced by the gamers’ community (Discord) to one embraced by privacy advocates (Jitsi). ![]() From the business-minded Zoom (which was also the most popular platform during this pandemic among our Instagram followers) to the mainstream YouTube. From live stream platforms to video conferencing platforms. ![]() We chose five platforms that differ most from each other. Visitors had to jump from platform to platform to view all the presentations. Each speaker was presenting on a different video conferencing or streaming platform. On 29 April 2020 we invited five speakers for a 5-minute talk about the role of the internet during the coronavirus pandemic. Our first live stream event became an experiment. Instead of opting for one platform, we made our research part of the event and included our audience in it. Platforms influence the way we share information and it’s important to be aware of that and look at it critically. These examples show how a simple change in the algorithms of the platforms we use daily can have a huge impact on our society. As a result Instagram has become the platform for self-promotion and narcism. On Instagram, selfies work better than photos without a person in it. According to The Atlantic, this cost the jobs of hundreds of journalists who produced non-video content. When it became clear that Facebook’s algorithm pushes video to the top of newsfeeds, users and news media took advantage of this by posting more video content. This kind of influence has been a focus of The Hmm for a longer time. What would be the best platform to host a cultural event like The Hmm? And how do these online platforms influence how we share and produce knowledge? Which is not surprising since most of the platforms we now use for our social life are made for business or for gaming. There's room for both to make money without further diverging the ecosystem.As it became clear that we couldn’t organise physical events at least until the summer, we had to face the question, like many cultural institutions: what would be the best way to translate our activities to the internet? None of the existing platforms seemed like a perfect fit. Ubuntu & Red Hat need to sit down in a room and have a constructive conversation to converge Snap and Flatpak into something new, deprecating the infrastructure built to date, and fixing some of the glaring problems. I wish Linus took more of a BDFL approach to the desktop occasionally. It's nice that I could rollback a version of IntelliJ that was buggy with a single snap command that took 5 seconds. It's nice that Jetbrains and Zoom have a way to publish apps that can run on all distros. I'd love to see some white hat activity targeted at compromising it, to demonstrate the shaky foundations.īut on the other hand, it's nice that I can run Zoom sandboxed (apparently - it's not obvious what the granted permissions are: ). They have a buildbot for automated updates from developers, but they accept binaries anyway (e.g.), so what's the point? It appears to be a fairly amateur effort, and yet is at the center of the infrastructure Red Hat and Gnome are pushing. They stopped publishing minutes (or moved them elsewhere?) in 2017 ( ). There's no mention of security on their wiki. The sandboxing needs to be tightened up.įlathub is a strange beast. Flatpak can request permission changes at install time (albeit declaring them), where users are likely to just click OK/OK/OK. Snap has the abysmally named "-classic" parameter to allow installs to "run without confinement". I agree that the implementation is lacking. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |